Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology

What (else) depends on phonology?

Larry M. Hyman
2017

Among the first implicational universals proposed were phonological ones such as, “If a language has nasalized vowels, it also has oral vowels”. However, as pointed out by Greenberg (1966), all (spoken) languages have oral vowels, so virtually anything can occur in the conditional clause if the consequent is an absolute universal (cf. “If a language has a velar implosive [ɠ], it has oral vowels” or even “If a language has a case system, it has oral vowels” (Greenberg 1966:509n)). I will start my discussion with some generalizations about phonological dependencies, in part to show...

Outward-looking y/Ø alternations in Luganda

Larry M. Hyman
2015

In a number of Eastern Bantu languages an issue of “outward looking morphology” arises from the interaction of the verb stem (root + suffixes) and what precedes it. Vowel-initial verb roots such as -er- ‘sweep’ appear as such when preceded by a CV- prefix in Luganda (Hyman & Katamba 1999: 371): (1) a. tú-er-a [tw-éer-a] ‘we sweep’, b. a-ér-a [a-yér-a] ‘s/he sweeps’, c. er-á [yer-á] ‘sweep!’. When preceded by a V- prefix (1b), or when initial (1c), a root-initial [y] appears. As seen in (2a), only V-initial roots acquire a [y], while (2b) shows that the root allomorphy is...

Lexical vs. grammatical tone: Sorting out the differences

Larry M. Hyman
2016

In this paper I raise the question of whether there are systematic differences between the lexical vs. grammatical functions of tone. Researchers of tone are largely influenced by the properties of the language(s) on which they work. Since tone has an almost exclusively lexical function in East and Southeast Asian languages, researchers of these languages focus primarily on how languages and speakers distinguish tone on lexical morphemes. Languages such Thai, Vietnamese and the wide range within Chinese lead one to posit a particular typology of lexical, monosyllabic tones which may...

Multiple exponence in the Lusoga verb stem

Larry M. Hyman
Sharon Inkelas
2017

Most overviews of the Bantu verb stem assume a structure with an obligatory verb root followed by possible derivational suffixes (“extensions”), and ending with an inflectional final vowel (FV) morpheme, e.g. Chichewa mang-an-a ‘tie each other’ (mang- ‘tie’, -an- ‘reciprocal’, -a ‘FV’). Based on Lusoga, a Bantu language spoken in Uganda, we describe and provide an account of several systematic exceptions to this pan-Bantu structure, particularly as concerns multiple spell-outs of the same derivational and inflectional morphemes. The multiple exponence observed in Lusoga poses...

In search of prosodic domains in Lusoga

Larry M. Hyman
2020

According to Selkirk’s (2011) “match theory”, the mapping of syntactic structure onto prosodic domains is universal. What this means is that if a language chooses to implement the relation between syntactic- or phrase-structure in the phonology, certain syntax-phonology relations should be predictable (and others not possible). This potentially produces asymmetries, as in Luganda, where a verb forms a tone phrase with what follows (e.g. an object, adjunct, right-dislocation), but not with what precedes (e.g. the subject, adverbial, left-dislocation). The purpose of my talk is to...

Multiple marking in Bantoid: from syntheticity to analyticity

Larry M. Hyman
2018

This paper addresses the mechanisms of change that lead from syntheticity to analyticity in the Bantoid languages of the Nigeria-Cameroon borderland area. I address the different strategies that are adopted as these languages lose applicative “verb extensions” found elsewhere in Bantu and Niger-Congo. I show that although historical recipient, benefactive, and instrumental applicative marking on verbs allowed multiple object noun phrases (send-APPL chief letter, cook-APPL child rice, cut-APPL knife meat), they have been replaced by adpositional phrases and/or serial verb...

Positional prominence vs. word accent: Is there a difference?

Larry M. Hyman
2019

One of the major unresolved issues in the study of word-accentual systems is determining what exactly counts as accent, a problem which is further complicated in languages with tone or so-called pitch-accent. In this chapter I address three African cases where the positional prominence effects are clearly word level, reasonably subject to a metrical (accentual) interpretation, but do not consistently coincide. In Ibibio, a Cross-River language spoken in Nigeria, greater consonant and vowel contrasts suggests that the initial stem syllable is the accented head of a trochaic foot,...

A note on Nuba Mountain verb extensions

Larry M. Hyman
2020

Based on the available literature and personal communications with specialists, this paper surveys the rich occurrence of verb extensions in the Nuba mountain languages which mark different grammatical functions such as causative, dative and locative applicatives, comparative, passive, antipassive, reciprocal/reflexive, and associative/instrumental, as well as ventive, itive, habitual, iterative and pluractional marking. Given the diversity of forms among the different groups in the area, a set of guidelines is considered to determine whether specific extensions can be reconstructed...

A sketch of Muniche segmental and prosodic phonology

Lev Michael
Stephanie Farmer
Gregory Finley
Christine Beier
Karina Sullón Acosta
2013

This paper presents a description of the segmental and prosodic phonology of Muniche, a critically endangered Peruvian Amazonian isolate. Using data from team-based fieldwork with a group of rememberers of Muniche, this paper describes the segmental inventory, syllable structure, and stress system of the language, plus a number of prosodically motivated epenthetic processes. A historical overview of the language and its contact with neighboring Kawapanan languages is also presented. Finally, the results of this study are compared with Gibson (1996), the sole previous study of Muniche...

Beguš speaks at USC

October 5, 2021

Gašper Beguš gave a colloquium talk at USC Linguistics on October 4 entitled "Deep Learning and Phonology: Comparing Behavioral and Neural Speech Data with Outputs of Deep Generative Models."